data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7d52/e7d5220974674fffd0c9d61cc879d7a9065358a7" alt=""
These men are dangerous. Available in several different sizes: copy and post elsewhere freely: the world needs to be warned.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af51c/af51cdc4f6bd57093bab75f2f39eb6c3eb80d050" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e318/8e3187093f48f6ad5a83a90613e651ac1b5bac62" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b36/d8b36e0e75f664bc9cd04198b517984149162f48" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdeb1/cdeb10610dfbf891f597f880cb4469a6b2912156" alt=""
Welcome to Pilgrim's Blogress: One Blog, One Lord. You'll find odd theological musings sitting alongside all sorts of miscellaneous thoughts and reflections on life, the universe and everything (and if you're wondering, the answer's 40, not 42: that was a miscalculation). Enjoy the ride...
I suspect what this comes down to is typical, run of the mill Brewer incompetence — the kind of slapdash approach to business you’d expect from someone who:
- Registers a company to manage the Durham Cathedral Shop under the name “Durham Cathederal Shop Management Co.” — of course, it’s possible that somebody else, equally incompetent, took care of the company registration. It’s also possible that this is a cynical way to ensure that anyone who files a claim against the “Durham Cathedral Shop Management Co.” will fail because there is, in fact, no such legal entity, but I honestly can’t see either of the Brewer Bros managing to think that far ahead, let alone that clearly;
- Says he wants to disassociate his company from the SPCK name but continues trading under SPCK signage until Trading Standards launch an investigation;
- Spells “Leicester” and “Worcester” as “Leichester” and “Worchester” — again, it’s entirely possible that somebody else, equally incompetent, compiled the list of shops and produced the map;
- Denies expressing his condolences to the family of a man who committed suicide after he fired him — of course, it’s entirely possible that somebody else took the initiative for this…
- Goes into panic mode the day before his bankruptcy filing is about to be scrutinised, realises that all the evidence needed to expose his folly is available online and starts firing off threatening C&D emails to all and sundry in a desperate bid to hide that evidence
- When challenged about threatening Dave Walker into taking his SPCK/SSG posts down, says ‘I have no idea what you are on about’ ;
- Can’t get the name of his own company right when he attempts to file it for bankruptcy;
- Fails to realise that filing a UK company for bankruptcy in the USA is not allowed anyway;
- Actually, I think that’s probably enough for now, but if someone else would like to continue this list, feel free to carry on.
How a law firm like Brewer & Pritchard PC manages to stay in business with such a klutz at the top remains a mystery…
For the avoidance of doubt:
I need to state once again that the Cathedral Chaper does not manage the shop in its Great Kichen. This is run as a franchise subject to strict business law, as it was in the days of SPCK. Not all petitioners appear to be clear that a franchise is a formal, legal arrangement to which the parties to it are bound.
I ask petitioner no. 273 (Daid Baxter) to note that this “business within the Cathedral” is NOT managed, is NOT controlled and is NOT run by the Cathedral itself. His comment that “letters sent to the Cathedral authorities go unanswered” is incorrect and I ask him to withdraw it. Whatever he means by this, I can assure him and everyone else that all correspondence addressed to the Cathdral is responded to efficiently and professionally (and, I need not add, all its debts are paid when due).
Michael Sadgrove
Dean
November 29, 2008, 3:43pm